Search for: "Favor v. California State Prison et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
1Filed 11/21/08CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATIONIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFIRST APPELLATE DISTRICTDIVISION FIVEMICHAEL MORALES et al. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm
Defendant in this case wished to argue in favor of the death sentence. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
The case is Minneci, et al., v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
California in 1990 and Brown v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE MCNAIR, ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW ) RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES CALLAHAN, )) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW ) RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION… [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Today the Connecticut Supreme Court heard arguments from the parties in Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
 The question raised in Harjo, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:46 am
The Sentencing Law Blog also reports on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Barber, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:16 pm
Castaneda, et al. (08-1529) and Henneford v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of states Amicus brief of the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys’ Advisory Council Amicus brief of the California State Association of Counties et al. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
Robert Olson and Marc Pettibone, et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
The appeal in Defenders of Wildlife, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the… [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Steel Corporation et al. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
The defendant currently faces up to 10 years in prison for each of the three counts of theft of government property. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
Title: City of Santa Rosa, California v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
§§ 4301 et seq. [read post]
